classpathx-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Classpathx-discuss] bug in MIME header parsing


From: Cedric Hyppolite
Subject: [Classpathx-discuss] bug in MIME header parsing
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:37:37 +0200

Hi,

I think I have found a bug in the handling of the MIME headers.

When sending a mail with an image attached the header is the following, when passing in function MimeBodyPart.getHeader(name, delimiter)

Sent mail:

getHeader Content-Type on
Header : Name 'Content-Type' Value 'image/png'
Header : Name 'Content-Transfer-Encoding' Value 'base64'
Header : Name 'Content-Disposition' Value 'attachment; filename=jsf- banner.png' Header : Name 'Content-ID' Value '<e944d2ce-d3d4-11da-a54c- e9bd449d3aa2>'returns 1 elements

Received mail:

getHeader Content-Type on
Header : Name 'Content-Type' Value 'image/png'
Header : Name 'Content-Id' Value 'BASE64'
Header : Name 'Content-Description' Value '7798'
Header : Name 'Content-Disposition' Value '<e944d2ce-d3d4-11da-a54c- e9bd449d3aa2>'returns image/png


The mail header as seen in my client is:
------=_Part_0_3353614.1145912236129
Content-Type: image/png
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=jsf-banner.png
Content-ID: <e944d2ce-d3d4-11da-a54c-e9bd449d3aa2>

I see an issue when using the IMAP provider, whereas the same mail can be sent and received without problems using POP.

I found this message highlighing a problem in the InternetHeaders.load function. In the code that I got (CVS as of Feb12) and in the latest, the fix proposed in the mail is not applied (use of CRLFInputStream) http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpathx-javamail/2005-03/ msg00003.html

I would guess that the problem comes from MimeMultipart.parse around line 400.

So my question is: How can this parsing problem be fixed ? And is there any code/test for MIME support that I could use as example of how I should use the API
to be able to send/receive MIME mail in POP/IMAP ?

Thanks in advance,
Cedric






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]