Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Modified wdialog-client.

[David MENTRE]

Hi,

[ Could you keep demexp-dev@ in Cc:? ]

2006/10/5, ketty . <address@hidden>:
> I will make things configure if you just wait a bit :)

Sure! :-)


> I am still playing around with things quite a bit, so i recommend you to
> wait with integrating to much of it. As far as i could see the web client
> did not use any configuration mechanism (only hardcoded values).

Yes: do what I say, not what I'm doing. ;-)

> I will look at Config_file.

Great!

> I am still playing around with things quite a bit, so i recommend you to wait 
> with integrating to much of it. As far as i could see the web client did not 
> use any configuration mechanism (only hardcoded values). I will look at 
> Config_file.

> (http://equah.afraid.org/demexp/hgweb.cgi?cs=7b23e558f8ef).
> Can't you
> > use regular mechanism like printk to avoid that?
>
> With printk do you mean Printf.ksprintf?

Yes. I should have checked.

> The whole Printf module is a big playing around with Obj.magic =)

Yes but this is done by OCaml core developers. Obj.magic is known to
be a can of worms.

> If you don't like Obj.magic you could use a syntax extention instead in this
> case. But don't know if i would call that less risky.

I don't like much syntax extension neither. :-/

> > PS: What is you real name (for credits) or do you prefer that I use ketty?
> >
>
> ketty is fine ^^

ack.

Thank you for the patches,
Best wishes,
d.