Re: [Denemo-devel] The release branch

[Jeremiah Benham]

On Oct 16, 2010, at 3:02 AM, Richard Shann <address@hidden>  
wrote:

> Jeremiah, Nils
> I see that you had to re-instate lyparserfuncs.h, presumably because I
> forgot to delete includes of it from the various files when I removed
> the old parser.

Yeah. I added into the tarball. I could not compile the tarball  
without including it. If it's supposed to left out I will change that  
(making sure it compiles) then and remove it from git.


> The puzzle then is, how did clean builds work - in
> particular windows gub?

Pulling from git provides the file. A tarball created with make dist  
does not because the file was not mentioned in src/Makefile.am.

Jeremiah

> I would like to avoid re-building the windows
> executable, as it will need re-testing. I am not proposing that we be
> impossibly fussy here - there are no actual changes of source code  
> here,
> just how you build from source. Executables are unaltered.
>
> So if you can verify that the sources labelled 0.8.20 do build  
> correctly
> on both platforms we are ready to release on Wednesday next, with the
> already-built-and-tested windows executable. (This executable will not
> be different if re-built, since the include file must have been  
> present,
> and it would in any case not affect the resultant binary).
>
> I have some very good progress to check in now if you can move  
> master on
> to 0.8.21, Anacrusis displaying properly, Breve, Longa and whole  
> measure
> rests, even plain chant all doing the right thing in the Denemo  
> display
> *and* the LilyPond!
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel