[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Feature branches ...
From: |
Nils Gey |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Feature branches ... |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:47:38 +0200 |
Just wanted to comment on this so that you know it is noticed and appreciated.
I will test it soon.
Nils
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:08:52 +0000 (UTC)
Ralf Mattes <address@hidden> wrote:
> Just occured to me that the ML might be a better place to for announcements.
> I just (yesterday) created two feature branches on Git:
>
> * feature-guile-loadpath
> Implements additions/modifications to Guile's %load-path to ease migration
> to guile modules (instead of one huge denemo.scm file).
> As briefly explained in the branch's README $(data-dir)/modules gets puhed
> to
> Guile's %load-path (I'm tempted to change this to $(data-dir)/scm/modules,
> any opinions?).
> It's also possible to extend denemo's Guile load-path by means of setting
> the environment variable DENEMO_LOAD_PATH (to a list of colon-separated
> directory names).
> This implementaion makes use of binreloc et. al.
>
> * feature-captain-hook
> A first stab at implementing hooks. Many ideas copied/snarfed from
> Guile's hooks, but our implementation provides return value semantics
> (as in guile's "or" hooks) also from the C side (might we also need
> an equivalent of guile's "and" hooks at some time?).
> Naming is anything but stable/decided on ....
>
> Careful: lazzy me decided to use guile-snarf - fine, but that means we
> have build source. You need to run 'make all' or equiv. to (re)generate
> these. Since we had to change src/Makefile.am a call to autoreconf would
> be useful as well ;-)
>
> Cheers, Ralf Mattes
>
> P.S.: please pull'n test
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>