[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:52:01 +0000 |
Working from your gub master branch also fails - nsis won't go through -
I don't know what may have changed since I used it before. The error
looks like this:
*** Stage: compile (nsis, tools)
invoking cd /home/rshann/gub/target/tools/build/nsis-2.46.src && scons
PREFIX=/home/rshann/gub/target/tools/root/usr
PREFIX_DEST=/home/rshann/gub/target/tools/install/nsis-2.46.src-root DEBUG=no
NSIS_CONFIG_LOG=yes SKIPUTILS="NSIS Menu"
/home/rshann/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib/scons-0.98.4/SCons/compat/_scons_hashlib.py:36:
DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
import md5
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
/home/rshann/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib/scons-0.98.4/SCons/Platform/posix.py:38:
DeprecationWarning: The popen2 module is deprecated. Use the subprocess
module.
import popen2
/home/rshann/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib/scons-0.98.4/SCons/Tool/msvs.py:37:
DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
import md5
EnvironmentError: No module named _sha256:
The only commit you have made to this is to set Debug=no in nsis.py
The guy who builds evince for windows said they used
https://live.gnome.org/Evince/Build
but I hesitate to head off in yet another direction...
Richard
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 10:16 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 12:18 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > Since you have had success compiling master before, I suggest you do
> > something like this:
> >
> > git diff master | less
> > git diff master -- gub/spec/python.py
> >
> > Then if you want something from master branch you can do something
> > like:
> >
> > git checkout master -- gub/specs/python.py
> >
> > This will pull the python.py from master.
>
> Hmm, I tried this but it seems that the differences are extensive. I'll
> try working from the other end of it, building from the master branch,
> and comparing with the release-0.9.6-mingw branch when things don't
> work.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> >
> > Jeremiah
> >
> >
> > On Feb 26, 2013 11:56 AM, "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>
> > wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 16:38 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 16:36 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 09:50 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > > > > with the denemo.py file I sent
> > > > Ah - this could be relevant - the one you sent is
> > different from the
> > > > one
> > > > in the repository on release-0.9.6-mingw branch.
> > (Although, as it has
> > > > failed while trying to build python, perhaps this couldn't
> > be the
> > > > cause
> > > > of the failure). I'll try the denemo.py you sent.
> > >
> > > Well that also failed on the python build ...
> > The library it is looking for is in two places in fact
> >
> > address@hidden:~/gub$ find . -name libpython2.4.so.1.0
> > ./target/tools/build/python-2.4.5/libpython2.4.so.1.0
> >
> > ./target/tools/install/python-2.4.5-root/home/rshann/gub/target/tools/root/usr/lib/libpython2.4.so.1.0
> >
> > The first of these I take it is the temporary location where
> > it has been
> > built, the second looks suspicious, as if a setting of
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> > has gone wrong. I notice that janneke's gub has a radically
> > different
> > python.py file, and a patch referring to the gcc -R option,
> > which
> > appears in the python.log of my build as an "unrecognised
> > option". It
> > seems that -R is equivalent to -rpath for directories (not
> > that I
> > understand that option either).
> >
> > As you can tell, I am rather wading through treacle here...
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, (continued)
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Richard Shann, 2013/02/24
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Richard Shann, 2013/02/24
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Richard Shann, 2013/02/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Jeremiah Benham, 2013/02/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Richard Shann, 2013/02/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Richard Shann, 2013/02/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Richard Shann, 2013/02/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Richard Shann, 2013/02/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Jeremiah Benham, 2013/02/26
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Richard Shann, 2013/02/27
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build,
Richard Shann <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Richard Shann, 2013/02/27
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Jeremiah Benham, 2013/02/27
- Re: [Denemo-devel] The missing regex in mxe build, Richard Shann, 2013/02/27