On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 22:29 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Richard Shann
> <
address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 22:04 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > It all compiles now. I get several warnings about possible
> unbound
> > variables. I am see that several scripts
>
>
> Are you sure that several scripts have this, not just that a
> single
> script is being invoked several times on startup?
> grepping through the menus I see only
>
> actions/menus/ObjectMenu/NotesRests/Tuplets/ToggleTripleting
>
>
> with that code in it. What's more, I can't see anything wrong
> with the
> syntax there - the definition is not inside an _expression_
> context as I
> understand it.
> It would perhaps be better to have an init.scm in the Tuplets
> directory
> to set up the initial define, but that is another issue...
>
> > have this in them:
> > (if (not (defined? 'ToggleTripleting::InsideTriplet))
> > (define ToggleTripleting::InsideTriplet #t))
>
>
> I had to do this to get the script to run:
> +;(if (not (defined? 'ToggleTripleting::InsideTriplet))
> +; (define ToggleTripleting::InsideTriplet #t))
> +(define ToggleTripleting::InsideTriplet #t)
>
> So we should have this defined in an init.scm? After doing this it
> allowed me to go further. I also noticed some things that was making
> guile complain. Here is the diff that stopped the warning about the
> wrong number of arguments to ChangeValue.
>
> --- a/actions/denemo-modules/wysiwyg.scm
> +++ b/actions/denemo-modules/wysiwyg.scm
> @@ -331,10 +331,10 @@
>
> ;;;;;;;; ChangePad
> (define (ChangePad oldstr prefixstring postfixstring)
> - (ChangeValue oldstr prefixstring postfixstring d-GetPadding "0"))
> + (ChangeValue oldstr prefixstring postfixstring (d-GetPadding "0")))
> ;;;;;;;; ChangeRelativeFontSize
> (define (ChangeRelativeFontSize oldstr prefixstring postfixstring)
> - (ChangeValue oldstr prefixstring postfixstring
> d-GetRelativeFontSize "0" DENEMO_OVERRIDE_AFFIX))
> + (ChangeValue oldstr prefixstring postfixstring
> (d-GetRelativeFontSize "0" DENEMO_OVERRIDE_AFFIX)))
>
>
>
>
>
> > They are giving an error like this:
> > #f definition in _expression_ context, where definitions are
> not
> > allowed, ((line . 2) (column . 4) (filename . #f)) (define
> > ToggleTripleting::InsideTriplet #t) #f)
> >
> > Other than that, everything seems to be working well.
>
> Well, presumably hitting Tab to turn triplets on/off is not
> working?
>
>
> No. It was not. With the changes I have made it is not functioning
> perfectly. I don't see the bracket and the ---3--- wyswig thing. It
> seems to be getting the wrong duration values of the notes in the
> contents of the tripplet.
>
> Jeremiah
>
>
> Richard
>
> > I will do some more testing.
> >
> > Jeremiah
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Richard Shann
> > <
address@hidden> wrote:
> > I have fixed denemo-modules/scheme.scm for guile 2.0
> > compatibility,
> > I haven't been able to check it though - there may
> be problems
> > with
> > other modules. Basically anything that would not
> execute at
> > run time
> > will cause 2.0 to barf when it tries to compile it.
> Such
> > things can be
> > deleted of course as they can't be in use.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 18:29 -0600, Jeremiah Benham
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Richard Shann
> > > <
address@hidden> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 14:27 -0600,
> Jeremiah Benham
> > wrote:
> > > > This seems to be working now. I still
> get this
> > error
> > > >
> > > > (#f unexpected syntax #f () #f)
> > > >
> > > > Otherwise denemo seems to be running
> fine. I think
> > before I
> > > did not
> > > > give it enough time for the modules to
> compile or
> > something.
> > > Shall I
> > > > push this commit to git?
> > >
> > >
> > > I think there will be at least some -
> perhaps many -
> > commands
> > > not
> > > working. Test instrument name and editing
> the
> > instrument name
> > > once it is
> > > set. These depend on denemo.scm parsing
> correctly,
> > and I think
> > > if
> > > denemo-modules/scheme.scm fails to parse
> the rest of
> > the code
> > > is
> > > abandoned.
> > > I clicked on the instrument name button and
> renamed it
> > successfully. I
> > > got this when I hit the tab key to insert a
> triplet even
> > though
> > > triplets are working via
> Notes/Rests->Tuplets->insert
> > triplet:
> > >
> > > ** (denemo:27357): WARNING **:
> > > The tag is
> > >
> > > syntax-error
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > But if the option to use guile-2.0 is just
> that - an
> > option -
> > > then it
> > > could go into git I guess...
> > >
> > > After I installed guile-2.0, denemo could no
> longer find my
> > > guile-1.8.pc. I checked with find and it was
> indeed gone. I
> > think this
> > > is a fault in the packaging. I read in the guile
> manual that
> > these are
> > > kind of "slotted" to where they are designed to
> allow
> > installation of
> > > a multitude of versions. pkg-config provides the
> CFLAGS and
> > LIBS of
> > > 1.6, 1.8, or 2,0 based on the guile-2.0.pc file. I
> am using
> > ubuntu
> > > 12.04 and I still see guile-1.6 in the
> repositories. There
> > is an
> > > environment variable I can set and guile will list
> all
> > depreciated
> > > code. I will check into that.
> > >
> > > Jeremiah
> > >
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>