[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don'
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don't have a tuner-type daughtercard? |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Jun 2006 13:48:20 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:40:51PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:27:37PM -0400, Marcus Leech wrote:
> >
> > The status bar indicated "failed to set frequency", which comes as a
> > result of 'r' being zero on return from
> > r = usrp.tune(foo).
Does the hardware in question have two Rx daughterboards installed?
Perhaps you were neglecting to set the -R <rx-subdev-spec> option
on the command line?
Eric
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don't have a tuner-type daughtercard?, Marcus Leech, 2006/06/24
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don't have a tuner-type daughtercard?, Eric Blossom, 2006/06/24
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don't have a tuner-type daughtercard?, Marcus Leech, 2006/06/24
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don't have a tuner-type daughtercard?, Eric Blossom, 2006/06/24
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don't have a tuner-type daughtercard?, Eric Blossom, 2006/06/25
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don't have a tuner-type daughtercard?, Marcus Leech, 2006/06/25
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don't have a tuner-type daughtercard?, Eric Blossom, 2006/06/25
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don't have a tuner-type daughtercard?,
Eric Blossom <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Correct idiom for frequency-setting when you don't have a tuner-type daughtercard?, Lamar Owen, 2006/06/26