discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py


From: ematlis
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] saturation with multi_fft.py
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:02:18 -0400 (EDT)

So there is no difference in the fpga code between the standard usrp_fft.py and multi_fft.py found in the multi-antenna directory? Then why does the latter specify std_4rx_0tx.rbf?

And to reiterate my original concern, the multi-antenna versions of the code will not accept more than between .3-.4 V p-p for decimation rates greater than 128; greater than .4 V p-p and the result acts as if the A/D chips are clipping. It's not a hardware issue with my USRP because the usrp_fft.py codes correctly measure up to 2 V p-p.

thanks for your help,
eric

On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Eric Blossom wrote:

On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 09:11:31AM -0400, address@hidden wrote:
Actually no, I want the code that enables a single usrp to receive signals
on two daughterboards.  Sorry about the confusion on that; I assumed the
"multi" in the filenames was referring to multiple daughterboards, I had
forgotten there's a multi-usrp capability as well.

The standard host and fpga code support multiple daughterboards as
long as they are sharing the same interp and decim rates.

For examples of this please take a look at

 gnuradio-examples/python/multi-antenna/*

So, with that cleared up, can you verify which file specifically I should
load into Quartus?  There is only one usrp_std.qpf project file in

usrp/fpga/toplevel/usrp_std

so it is unclear to me how to compile for the two-daughter board case as
opposed to the single.  Do I need to configure something in the project
file for the two-daughterboard case?

There is nothing for you to do.  The standard code supports two
daughterboards.  On the fpga it's handled via the muxes implemented in the
FPGA.  See http://gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/UsrpRfxDiagrams

thanks,
eric

p.s.- on a positive note, at least my efforts to date have revealed what
updates the multi_usrp.qsf file needs to compile!

Thanks!
Eric





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]