[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older machines
From: |
Josh Blum |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older machines |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Mar 2013 11:18:04 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 03/01/2013 05:16 PM, Tom Hendrick wrote:
> Josh,
>
> Thank you so much for the suggestion. I will try this. I have 4GB of
> ram and a 4GB swapfile size. Do you recommend any particular setting
> for set_max_output_buffer(long max_output_buffer)?
>
>
Make it 10s of megabytes, see if it helps.
> Should I leave tb.run() as is, or modify the number of n_output_items
> in conjunction with the
I think that part of the API is deprecated (the argument to run). There
is a similar call on top block, but Im recommending just the usrp source
block.
>
> void set_max_output_buffer(long max_output_buffer)?
>
>
> Also, do you recommend any particular settings using uhd_usrp_probe
> --args="serial=123456, recv_frame_size=XXXX,num_recv_frames=XXXX",
> send_frame_size=XXXX,send_recv_frames=XXX"
>
>
> or should I leave it default? The custom 4 channel usrp block in the
> older gnuradio version had the fusb_block and fusb_nblocks both set
> to 512*32
>
Go with the default while trying the above.
-josh
> Thanks, -Tom
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________ From: Josh Blum <address@hidden> To:
> address@hidden Sent: Friday, March 1, 2013 2:55 PM Subject:
> Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older
> machines
>
>
>
> On 03/01/2013 04:51 PM, Tom Hendrick wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've had trouble making a 4 channel USRP samples at 1Ms/s write to
>> file at 500 kS/s with ubuntu 12.04 and libuhd. I am getting
>> several overruns and I had tried adjusting some of the parameters
>> using usrd_probe_devices but with no success. I have a laptop with
>> a duo core centrino processor which should be enough.
>>
>> I've made this 4 channel work successfully with the same exact
>> laptop and with ubuntu 10.04 and the older version of gnuradio that
>> uses libusrp. I get no underruns at all even for an entire hour of
>> writing to file.
>>
>>
>> Has anyone else experienced performance differences between libusrp
>> and libuhd? I just want to make sure it isn't a configuration
>> problem or something I'm doing wrong causing the overruns. If its
>> likely an issue with libuhd, I guess I will just keep a backup of
>> ubuntu 10.04 and gnuradio libusrp version installation files and
>> leave my dual boot setup intact.
>>
>> Thank you very much, - Tom
>>
>>
>
> You might try setting a very large output buffer on the usrp source
> block. I heard this helps (you should be able to call this in python
> after the block constructs):
>
> /*! * \brief Sets max buffer size on all output ports. */ void
> set_max_output_buffer(long max_output_buffer)
>
> -josh
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
>> mailing list address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>
> _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
> mailing list address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
- [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older machines, Tom Hendrick, 2013/03/01
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older machines, Josh Blum, 2013/03/01
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older machines, Tom Hendrick, 2013/03/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older machines, Josh Blum, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older machines, Tom Hendrick, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older machines, Marcus D. Leech, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older machines, Tom Hendrick, 2013/03/11
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] LibUSRP vs LibUHD Performance on older machines, Tom Hendrick, 2013/03/11