[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird
From: |
Marcus Müller |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:25:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Actually I'm a little confused - Is seeing an AGC in an AM demodulator
something you usually do?
Especially the feedforward AGC should be rather err jumpy with a scope
of but 256 samples, unless I'm missing something; f_sample seems to be
1024ksps, thus 256 samples max search and rescaling should behave very
badly if there are baseband signal contents below 4kHz -- and that
should be the case for audio, usually?
Greetings,
Marcus
On 25.04.2014 16:03, Marcus Leech wrote:
> An AM demodulator is a squaring function. It can only *ever*
> produce positive values. You can remove DC offset by using a
> high-pass filter after it. on Apr 25, 2014, *Anton Komarov*
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> But when we have only positive values that means in fact we have
> 0.5 DC offset, and that is bad. Moreover i've made test recording
> with GQRX - waveform is fine! Looking into the code, nothing
> special, am demod->low-pass->wav-sink.
>
> -- public PGP key http://pastebin.com/dqZqgyVE
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Michael Ossmann <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 04:14:30PM +0400, Anton Komarov wrote:
>>
>> Hi, you can find in attach AM demodulator grc file. Everything
>> is straight forward with demod but audio file generated looks
>> weird. Only positive values of amplitude.
> The particular definition of "amplitude" adopted by GNU Radio (and
> pretty much everyone else in SDR as far as I know) is "absolute
> value". It is correct for it to always be positive.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
> mailing list address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
> mailing list address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTWn5MAAoJEBQ6EdjyzlHtWSEIAKSNLkujZEL/lpmy/CBrK76+
144zh4QY9QkAd9jgYHE/lSp6oAP2EEIXI7xQw1AC+2c2c2+pcG92ydJs/2/pvEa3
zfyVUtSr5e8qByokifDCq1HeMFG4q5Uis/cNgWlQPBeWR5My6ngnE3xC4TmMhGO6
WCYFqyrf7dz+P/cXClRs9jIVv4HKPLCZky9qdmG/9rXFxovQt369boaXDdvtc6Ga
dnNswR2zXh63IH+ZWaARTiB61GJ/oPw/yh1jL9inVOFhioZstUFK0xS1ACxFZBiY
P1nHuixHkGXmIp6jp1QXo6H9QAqVZ5z/H4Tngd8EM+i+KsqxaJncvzGW7MVgaQA=
=XADd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird, Anton Komarov, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird, Michael Ossmann, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird, Anton Komarov, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird, Marcus Leech, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird,
Marcus Müller <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird, Anton Komarov, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird, Marcus Müller, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird, Activecat, 2014/04/28
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Waveform after AM demodulation looks weird, Anton Komarov, 2014/04/28