Re: "external" frameworks

[Chris B . Vetter]

On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 03:15:51 -0200
Pedro Ivo Andrade Tavares <ptavares@iname.com> wrote:
> I did, around that timeframe... I sent my patches to them, and it
> would seem some of my changes were integrated on their main sources..
> Search the list archives, and you'll find some comments I made at the
> time.
> After my (admittedly naïve) port, Karl Kraft had another go at it,
> and he also sent them his patches.

That would explain all the #ifdef GNUSTEP ...

> The license is something I can live with. It's similar to qmail's,
> but not so restrictive.

So can I, but - (I admit, I'm not savvy when it comes to the GNU
license) if we could get Omni to allow us to use their framework
(that is, the source, ported to GNUstep, with their approval)
"as is" - we might get more developers interested in GNUstep.

-- 
Chris