discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: frameworks Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH.


From: Björn Gohla
Subject: Re: frameworks Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH.
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 18:45:01 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 04 March 2002 23:13, Mirko Viviani wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Mar 2002, Helge Hess  wrote:
> > We always tried to map frameworks to shared libraries. Actually this
> > might be the wrong approach, we should consider loading frameworks as a
> > bundle
>
> I already though about this in the past but it is not a good move.
> Libraries has some problems and bundles have others.
>
> > since this also gives us -bundleForClass: etc !
>
> -bundleForClass: is working with framework. At least it was in the past, I
> don't know now.

could anyone for the sake of clarity describe what exactly the differences 
are between bundles, frameworks and libraries? i only have a rough idea.
- -- 
/* Nobody will ever see this message :-) */
panic("Cannot initialize video hardware\n");
        2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/arch/m68k/atari/atafb.c
pub  1024D/834F4976 2001-01-07 Björn Gohla (Wissenschaftler, Weltbürger) 
<b.gohla@gmx.de>
     Key fingerprint = 9FF4 FEDA CCDF DA0E 14D5  8129 6C14 3C39 834F 4976
sub  1024g/29571FE2 2001-01-07
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8ikokbBQ8OYNPSXYRAlM5AJ4xIIu5Qw7uRKp8EJvVBxFjp1e9cgCfeQRY
3vxTJSBUct5hqR4hBNzgN9o=
=Jwrq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]