[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Of applications and documents
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: Of applications and documents |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jun 2003 12:56:44 -0000 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
David Adam Bordoley <bordoley@msu.edu> wrote:
> real opportunity to escape the traditional application metaphor and instead
> provide a documented oriented view of the user's system.
Do you mean by moving to "everything is a document" (which has failed every
time I've seen it tried) or by using the current Services and Tools menus a
lot more (which I think we probably should do, but then we need to decide on
some "core services" which could be run by a system like Debian's
alternatives)?
Apologies for excessively long brackets...
> [...] abandon or at
> least supplement the traditional unix filesystem with a database oriented
> search one (reiserfs may provide a solution here, although I'm not too
> familiar with the details).
Come on! I manage my real files by putting them in wallets in files in
boxes on shelves in rooms... If I want quick searching, I keep an index
of them. Are you really telling me you know of a better way?
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://slef@jabber.at
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Thought: "Changeset algebra is really difficult."
- Re: Of applications and documents, (continued)
Re: Of applications and documents, Eric Christopherson, 2003/06/02
Re: Of applications and documents, Sheldon Gill, 2003/06/03
Re: Of applications and documents, David Adam Bordoley, 2003/06/03
Message not available
Re: Of applications and documents,
MJ Ray <=
Re: Of applications and documents, William F. Adams, 2003/06/07