Re: New warnings (hopefully) in gcc 3.4

[David Ayers]

Nicola Pero wrote:

> > [...] The @encode mechanism would still not recognize that 
> > -(id)method:(NSSize)aSize and -(id)method:(NSPoint)aPoint are 
> > equivalent.
> >    
>
> Hmmm.  Are they really equivalent ?  The argument types seem to be quite
> different.
>  
Alex has just convinced me also.  :-)

My point was, "it used to work and now it wouldn't" (well the example 
was bad, I meant:
-(NSSize)method and -(NSPoint)method )

But yes, I could live w/o this.  I'm just thinking the IMP assumption 
must always be incorrect, even if it may work in many cases.

Cheers,
David