[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-x window manager
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: non-x window manager |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:58:19 -0700 |
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 03:40:18 +0200
Larry Cow <no@spam.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:25:17 -0700
> "Chris B. Vetter" <chrisv@web4inc.com> wrote:
> > As far as I know, directfb still uses/needs/relies on X11.
> Actually, DirectFB is just a thin layer above Linux Framebuffer. By
> itself, it has nothing to do with X.
> But, there is XDirectFB, which is an X Server using DirectFB as a
> backend.
Ah. No Linux here, so I didn't know that. Thanks for the info,
--
Chris
- Re: non-x window manager, (continued)
- Re: non-x window manager, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/10/21
- Re: non-x window manager, Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2003/10/21
- Re: non-x window manager, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/10/21
- Re: non-x window manager, Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2003/10/21
- Re: non-x window manager, Chad Hardin, 2003/10/22
- Re: non-x window manager, Alwin Blok, 2003/10/22
- Re: non-x window manager, Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2003/10/21
- Re: non-x window manager, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/10/21
- Re: non-x window manager, Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2003/10/21
- Message not available
- Re: non-x window manager, Larry Cow, 2003/10/21
- Re: non-x window manager,
Chris B. Vetter <=
Re: non-x window manager, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2003/10/22
Re: non-x window manager, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/10/22