[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator
From: |
David Stes |
Subject: |
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:39:57 GMT |
User-agent: |
tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.18 (i686)) |
In comp.lang.objective-c John C. Randolph <jcr@nospam.idiom.com> wrote:
>
> Your definition of the word "normally" is rather bizarre. As you
> already know, nearly all Obj-C code that exists is based on the Cocoa
> framework. You may wish this were not the case, but it is.
If you ever wrote a piece of real software, you'd know that portability is
important in the real world; regardless of what you may wish.
It's not acceptable that a bad memory management of a lousy root class
results in different behavior on Linux and on your Apple OS; it's not the
fault of Linux, it's the fault of the absence of decent design in the autor
release stuff.
Normal Objective-C doesn't use NSObject and its memory management; this
memory management is really very specific to the "NS" class, and NS does not
stand for normal Objective-C.
The NS prefix is specifically to indicate that it is a particular
non-standard vendor specific class.
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Pete French, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator,
David Stes <=
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/23
- [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Helge Hess, 2004/04/23
- Re: [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Greg Parker, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Markus Hitter, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/24
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Gregory John Casamento, 2004/04/24