[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator
From: |
Gregory John Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Apr 2004 08:10:32 -0700 (PDT) |
David,
Take it off of the gnustep-discuss list, please. If we want to hear your
tripe about POC we can go to comp.lang.objective-c for that. It's causing
extra, uneeded, noise on this list.
GJC
--- David Stes <stes@D5E02AFE.kabel.telenet.be> wrote:
> In comp.lang.objective-c John C. Randolph <jcr@nospam.idiom.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> If you ever wrote a piece of real software, you'd know that portability
> is
> >> important in the real world; regardless of what you may wish.
> >
> > I'm well aware of the importance of portability. That's why I use GCC.
>
> I'm afraid portability is more than just that, Mr. Apple employee.
> Instead of boasting that you follow the rules of this silly autorelease
> memory
> management, you'd better start to do some intellectual activity such as
> *designing* a memory management instead of just following rules like a slave.
> The creative activity of *designing* rules is all about avoid major mistakes
> like the autorelease pool memory management: object-oriented design is not
> about placing the responsibility for such things as memory management on the
> user, it is about *hiding* complexity in modular software units.
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
=====
Gregory John Casamento -- CEO/President Open Logic Corp.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25ยข
http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, (continued)
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Pete French, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/23
- [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Helge Hess, 2004/04/23
- Re: [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Greg Parker, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Markus Hitter, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/24
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator,
Gregory John Casamento <=