[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cocotron
From: |
David Ayers |
Subject: |
Re: Cocotron |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:24:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20061113) |
Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
>
> On 29 Dec 2006, at 01:37, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 28.12.2006 um 17:37 schrieb Gregory John Casamento:
>>
>>> Nikolaus,
>>>
>>> They would be wrong. GNUstep not an OS.
>>
>>
>> They might be wrong, but it's not their fault. If we want people to
>> get it right we'll have to explain it to them in a catchy way - even
>> if that might include to rename gnustep-base to gnustep- foundation
>> and gnustep-gui to gnustep-appkit.
>
>
> I actually have no problem at all with the idea of renaming ... in
> fact, for compatibility it might be nice if we could build them so that
> they could be used both as libraries and frameworks at the same time,
> so that cocoa developers could link to them the same way they do on
> macos. I don't know how to modify makefiles etc to build them that
> way, but it can't really be all that hard.
I think it would be great if -base/-gui could be compiled as
NATIVE_LIBRARY. I once took a shot at it, but the BaseAdditions part
wrt apple-apple-apple made it very messy. I'm not sure if it could be
split due to the interdependencies.
Cheers,
David
- Re: Cocotron,
David Ayers <=
- Re: Cocotron, David Ayers, 2007/01/01
- Re: Cocotron, Chris B. Vetter, 2007/01/02
- Re: Cocotron, Philippe C.D. Robert, 2007/01/04
- Re: Cocotron, Helge Hess, 2007/01/07
- Re: Cocotron, Gregory John Casamento, 2007/01/07