[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SimpleWebKit (was GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty))
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: SimpleWebKit (was GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty)) |
Date: |
6 Mar 2007 10:53:16 -0800 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
>
> I agree with GJC that it is a big duplicate to have our own web browser.
Ok, that brings up a different aspect - maintaining an own web browser
is a duplicate of work. And that is a completey different topic/
decision.
1. SimpleWebKit as part of mySTEP is here and shows that it works.
2. And I will continue to work on it since I have reasons to do so.
3. The offer to the GNUstep community to adopt it for a GNUstep web
browser it is here.
4. But the GNUstep community must decide if they want to follow this
path and integrate it or not.
> But I also agree with Nicola that we need some basic xhtml view for
> text conversion,
> GNUMail and Grr have to render xhtml in many cases.
Yes they receive HTML formatted mails.
The question remains to me why we should write a (new?) basic xhtml
view when we can have a full (x)html view - to avoid duplication.
Nikolaus
- Re: SimpleWebKit (was GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty)), (continued)
Message not available
Re: SimpleWebKit (was GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty)), Gregory John Casamento, 2007/03/06
Re: SimpleWebKit (was GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty)), Nicola Pero, 2007/03/06
Re: SimpleWebKit (was GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty)), Peter Cooper, 2007/03/07
Re: SimpleWebKit (was GNUstep Web browser (was Re: WebKit Bounty)), Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2007/03/07