[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libobjcxx
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: libobjcxx |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:12:23 +0100 |
On 5 Oct 2012, at 10:56, Kal Conley wrote:
> If I move to using 'Makefile' instead of GNUmakefile to build it then do
> I only need to run core/make/configure once after I build libobjc2 and
> pass the path of the library to configure?
Yes. Part of the reason for the Makefile is to solve the circular dependency
problem. GNUstep Make depends on a working libobjc, so using it to install
libobjc doesn't work.
On a modern platform for Objective-C development, you may not even have GCC
installed, so the bootstrapping process on, for example, FreeBSD, was to
install GCC and its libobjc, then install GNUstep Make, then uninstall GCC and
its libobjc, then install GNUstep libobjc, then reconfigure and reinstall
GNUstep Make, then proceed with the rest of the GNUstep install. Now, you just
install libobjc first, then install the rest.
David
-- Sent from my Cray X1
- libobjcxx, Kal Conley, 2012/10/04
- Re: libobjcxx, David Chisnall, 2012/10/04
- Re: libobjcxx, Kal Conley, 2012/10/05
- Re: libobjcxx, David Chisnall, 2012/10/05
- Re: libobjcxx, Kal Conley, 2012/10/05
- Re: libobjcxx,
David Chisnall <=
- Re: libobjcxx, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2012/10/05
- Re: libobjcxx, Kal Conley, 2012/10/05
- Re: libobjcxx, David Chisnall, 2012/10/05