[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Auth]Freport Update
From: |
John |
Subject: |
[Auth]Freport Update |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 02:54:12 -0600 |
Well, I kept promising myself I'd do an update, and never seemed to be
able to write one in cold blood. Here's what's coded so far:
Freport plugin: basic configuration done, sub-plug system coded.
Subplugs: Standard Local AuthMaster and DataBank interfaced, routines
for database and encryption are designed, but not yet developed (help
needed).
Remote: protocol design completed, not yet coded; waiting on database
work.
Website: I've a whole bunch of handwritten pseudomodel that needs to be
translated to the UML, but I've not been feeling particularly artistic.
That's it. Although ID-Sec has been much better supported, I still see
it's failure to protect the "sites-visited meta-data" as a major
departure from DotGNU's original edict of fully protecting customer
privacy. I'm given to ask: do we go with code that's out there or do we
stick by our philosophical guns?
Anyone who wishes to offer me assistance can contact me privately. I'll
be nicked at the mass-meeting as "FrePort".
John Le'Brecage
John Le'Brecage
- [Auth]Freport Update,
John <=
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Hans Zandbelt, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, David Sugar, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, John, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Hans Zandbelt, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, John, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/15
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, John, 2002/03/16
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, Hans Zandbelt, 2002/03/16
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, David Sugar, 2002/03/16
- Re: [Auth]Freport Update, John, 2002/03/16