[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities?
From: |
Gabriel Ambuehl |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities? |
Date: |
Mon, 28 May 2007 20:15:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 |
On Monday 28 May 2007 20:11:59 David Schneider-Joseph wrote:
> Alternatively, couldn't the full signatures be regenerated on the
> destination side, from the files themselves, and compared with the
> source? This would obviate the need for a full backup. Rather, it
> would just perform a "full verification".
This would circumvent the whole point of having encrypted backup. If the
destination is allowed to read your files, you can send them unencrypted from
the beginning...
pgp35_RbEX5uZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities?, Charles Duffy, 2007/05/28