[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities?
From: |
Andreas Schildbach |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2007 08:24:22 +0200 |
Spam detection software, running on the system "ipx20019.ipxserver.de", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Charles Duffy wrote: >> In this case, may I suggest a
new feature: Automatically starting a >> full backup after a defined
time span. E.g. "--full-backup-every 1M" >> would force a full backup
when the last full backup is older than one >> month (or not existing).
> > Do it yourself. > > No, seriously -- it won't even take any
modification of Duplicity code! > Just store your backups in a location
which includes YYYY-MM in the > directory structure; that way, there
will be automatic rotation every > month. [...]
Content analysis details: (6.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
[85.181.22.71 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[85.181.22.71 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
[85.181.22.71 listed in combined.njabl.org]
0.0 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[85.181.22.71 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2007 08:24:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) |
Charles Duffy wrote:
In this case, may I suggest a new feature: Automatically starting a
full backup after a defined time span. E.g. "--full-backup-every 1M"
would force a full backup when the last full backup is older than one
month (or not existing).
Do it yourself.
No, seriously -- it won't even take any modification of Duplicity code!
Just store your backups in a location which includes YYYY-MM in the
directory structure; that way, there will be automatic rotation every
month.
This won't really work, because of side effects. The --cleanup,
--collection-status and --remove-older-than commands would stop finding
all backups.
Regards,
Andreas
--- End Message ---
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities?, Charles Duffy, 2007/05/28
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities?,
Andreas Schildbach <=