[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Duplicity-talk] Strange behaviour when specifying a timestamp
From: |
Eric B. |
Subject: |
[Duplicity-talk] Strange behaviour when specifying a timestamp |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:32:00 -0400 |
A couple of things I have encountered as I am testing out the -t option with
duplicity. I am not sure if it is my interpretation of the docs, or if they
are bugs in duplicity itself.
1) I was hoping to generate a list of files in the backup given a particular
timestamp. ie:
# duplicity list-current-files -t2008-03-13
file:///duplicity/test --no-encryption
However, this gives me a list of files all currently backed up by duplicity;
not the list as at 2008-03-13 backup, which I would have expected. Is
browing list of files based on timestamp not a supported feature?
2) I tried to restore files given a particular timestamp. I was expecting
duplicity to restore all files backup up at that timestamp. According to
the docs, if only a date is given, the restore will be taken at midnight of
that date. So -t2008-03-13 would imply 2008-03-13T00:00 :00-04:00 would it
not? (I am in EDT). Or would that imply 2008-03-13T00:00:00-00:00?
# duplicity restore -t2008-03-13 file:///duplicity/test --no-encryption
/tmp/dup
I would therefore have expected the last backup prior to 2008-03-13T00:00
:00-04:00 to be restored. However, in my case, the first backup was made at
2008-03-13T10:58:04-04:00. So I was expecting nothing to be restored.
However, duplicity still restored everything from my
2008-03-13T10:58:04-04:00 backup. Is this expected behaviour? Even if I
specify the full timestamp as 2008-03-13T00:00 :00-04:00, the first backup
from 10:58:04-04:00 is still restored.
Thanks for the clarification.
Eric
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Duplicity-talk] Strange behaviour when specifying a timestamp,
Eric B. <=