[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch
From: |
Michael Terry |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:25:22 -0500 |
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Dan Muresan <address@hidden> wrote:
> But, again, as an optional component, I don't see any problems with
> dbus; and when multiple processes will actually need to watch the same
> duplicity, perhaps dbus will become indispensable :)
You sound like you doubt the usefulness of such a thing. :) I could
imagine at least one scenario in which it would be useful: a
panel/notification-area applet that watches for duplicity processes
from cron or my frontend and provides feedback/control on it.
For something like that, dbus makes it very easy.
-mt
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Dan Muresan, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Dan Muresan, 2008/11/02
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Dan Muresan, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Dan Muresan, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Edgar Soldin, 2008/11/04
- [Duplicity-talk] asynchronous-uploads, Richard Scott, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] asynchronous-uploads, Peter Schuller, 2008/11/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch,
Michael Terry <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Dan Muresan, 2008/11/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Michael Terry, 2008/11/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Dan Muresan, 2008/11/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Richard Scott, 2008/11/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Edgar Soldin, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch, Kenneth Loafman, 2008/11/04