Re: [Duplicity-talk] File found in list-current-files, but won't restore.

[edgar . soldin]

asked him for the entire log below already ;).. ede

On 25.01.2017 18:18, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> The problem he noticed:
> 
> /Error 'First patch in sequence [<duplicity.path.ROPath instance at 
> 0x7ff444ab75f0>] was a diff' patching .
> /
> 
> Seems to have ended the run prematurely, stopping on vol 2 of 6249, but a 
> truncated log tells us very little.
> 
> ...Ken
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:48 AM, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> 
> wrote:
> 
>     0.6.23/24 worked pretty stable.. considering the error i guess that 
> paramiko again does not list the full backup, but i can only judge that from 
> the -v9 output.
> 
>     it would be interesting though to install the latest 0.7.x in parallel 
> and see if the error vanishes.
> 
>     ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>
> 
>     On 25.01.2017 17:34, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
>     > One thing to note is that the 0.6 series has been deprecated.  You 
> should probably upgrade to 0.7.11 ASAP.
>     >
>     > ...Ken
>     >
>     >
>     > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:32 AM, edgar.soldin--- via Duplicity-talk 
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden 
> <mailto:address@hidden>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     jepp, the entire log would help. you might send the link privately, 
> if you want.
>     >
>     >     ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net> <http://duply.net>
>     >
>     >     On 24.01.2017 18:11, Nertskull via Duplicity-talk wrote:
>     >     > I ran it again with -v9.  I can put the output up on pastebin if 
> still needed.  But first I did find it spit out the following error.
>     >     >
>     >     > *********
>     >     > No orphaned or incomplete backup sets found.
>     >     > PASSPHRASE variable not set, asking user.
>     >     > Registering (mktemp) temporary file 
> /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-0NoraC-2
>     >     > Deleting /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-0NoraC-2
>     >     > Forgetting temporary file 
> /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-0NoraC-2
>     >     > Processed volume 1 of 6249
>     >     > Registering (mktemp) temporary file 
> /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-86W2Nx-3
>     >     > Error 'First patch in sequence [<duplicity.path.ROPath instance 
> at 0x7ff444ab75f0>] was a diff' patching .
>     >     > Deleting /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-86W2Nx-3
>     >     > Forgetting temporary file 
> /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-86W2Nx-3
>     >     > Processed volume 2 of 6249
>     >     > Releasing lockfile <lockfile.LinkFileLock instance at 
> 0x7ff445991cf8>
>     >     > Removing still remembered temporary file 
> /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mkstemp-Q0Le0w-1
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > *********
>     >     >
>     >     > Not sure what the 'First patch...' error means.
>     >     >
>     >     > I'm positive the file name is spelled perfectly. I've copied it 
> straight from the list-current-files.  Plus I've tried restoring the parent 
> directory, and everything restores except the .odb files. So it definitely is 
> not a mis-typing issue.
>     >     >
>     >     > I'm running Kubuntu 14.04.5 LTS
>     >     >
>     >     > Duplicity 0.6.23
>     >     >
>     >     > If you still need the entire log output, let me know and I can 
> put it up somewhere.
>     >     >
>     >     > Thanks!
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > On 01/24/2017 11:09 AM, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
>     >     >> There is nothing special about .odb files, so rerun the restore 
> with -v9, save the entire log, and post it on pastebin or reply with 
> attachment.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Are you quite certain that the filename is spelled and cased 
> correctly.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Which duplicity version are you using?  What OS distro/version?
>     >     >>
>     >     >> ...Thanks,
>     >     >> ...Ken
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Nertskull via Duplicity-talk 
> <<mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden 
> <mailto:address@hidden>>>address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> 
> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>> wrote:
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     I have a duplicity encrypted backup of a folder.  That 
> folder has many
>     >     >>     subfolders and 4 files.
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     1 file is an excel file.  The other 3 are LibreOffice Base 
> database
>     >     >>     (.odb) files.
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     When I run
>     >     >>
>     >     >>         duplicity list-current-files --encrypt-key XXX 
> file:///path/to/backups
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     I get a list of the files.  ALL 4 are included in that list. 
>  I see all
>     >     >>     four files.
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     When I run
>     >     >>
>     >     >>         duplicity --encrypt-key XXX --file-to-restore
>     >     >>     'relative/path/to/ExcelFile.xlsx' file:///path/to/backup 
> /path/to/restore
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     I get the Excel file restored with NO problems.
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     But if I run the SAME command, but just change from the 
> excel file to
>     >     >>     the base.odb file.  I get an error saying the
>     >     >>
>     >     >>         "file.odb not found in archive, no files restored"
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     But of course it is there!  It is listed in the 
> 'list-current-files'.
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     And I know my syntax is right, because I can restore the 
> excel file.
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     Is there something weird about .odb files that causes 
> duplicity to bug out?
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     ....
>     >     >>     So I thought, alright lets restore the entire folder.  And 
> sure enough,
>     >     >>     no .odb files.  None of the 3 .odb files restore.  Even 
> though they are
>     >     >>     listed as part of the backup using 'list-current-files'.
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     Why do these files not restore?
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     _______________________________________________
>     >     >>     Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     >     >>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> 
> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> <mailto:address@hidden 
> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>
>     >     >>     https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>> 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>>>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     > Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     >     > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden 
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
>     >     > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>>
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     >     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden 
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
>     >     https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>>
>     >
>     >
> 
>