duplicity-talk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] File found in list-current-files, but won't restore


From: edgar . soldin
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] File found in list-current-files, but won't restore.
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:40:59 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0

yeah please provide the _full_ log!

also a file listing of /media/Mo/Backups/Local_Backups/wData_R_3C1M1D/ would be 
of interest!

..ede/duply.net

On 25.01.2017 18:33, Nertskull wrote:
> I have uploaded the log file to pastebin.
> 
> The entire file was 2.7MB, which is too large for pastebin.  I think I have 
> all the important stuff.  Hopefully that is enough, if not, I guess I could 
> maybe make a dropbox link or something to download the entire file.
> 
> Here is the pastebin link
> 
> http://pastebin.com/tqR39Kta
> 
> I'll also look into updating duplicity.  I'll wait for a bit though, just so 
> I can continue to recreate this error for troubleshooting. 
> 
> Thanks all.
> 
> -dan
> 
> 
> 
> On 01/25/2017 12:26 PM, Kenneth Loafman via Duplicity-talk wrote:
>> @jepp, please include the entire command line as well.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:20 AM, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>     asked him for the entire log below already ;).. ede
>>
>>     On 25.01.2017 18:18, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
>>     > The problem he noticed:
>>     >
>>     > /Error 'First patch in sequence [<duplicity.path.ROPath instance at 
>> 0x7ff444ab75f0>] was a diff' patching .
>>     > /
>>     >
>>     > Seems to have ended the run prematurely, stopping on vol 2 of 6249, 
>> but a truncated log tells us very little.
>>     >
>>     > ...Ken
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:48 AM, <address@hidden 
>> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>> 
>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     >     0.6.23/24 worked pretty stable.. considering the error i guess 
>> that paramiko again does not list the full backup, but i can only judge that 
>> from the -v9 output.
>>     >
>>     >     it would be interesting though to install the latest 0.7.x in 
>> parallel and see if the error vanishes.
>>     >
>>     >     ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net> <http://duply.net>
>>     >
>>     >     On 25.01.2017 17:34, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
>>     >     > One thing to note is that the 0.6 series has been deprecated.  
>> You should probably upgrade to 0.7.11 ASAP.
>>     >     >
>>     >     > ...Ken
>>     >     >
>>     >     >
>>     >     > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:32 AM, edgar.soldin--- via 
>> Duplicity-talk <<mailto:address@hidden>address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden 
>> <mailto:address@hidden>> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> 
>> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>> wrote:
>>     >     >
>>     >     >     jepp, the entire log would help. you might send the link 
>> privately, if you want.
>>     >     >
>>     >     >     ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net> <http://duply.net> 
>> <http://duply.net>
>>     >     >
>>     >     >     On 24.01.2017 18:11, Nertskull via Duplicity-talk wrote:
>>     >     >     > I ran it again with -v9.  I can put the output up on 
>> pastebin if still needed.  But first I did find it spit out the following 
>> error.
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > *********
>>     >     >     > No orphaned or incomplete backup sets found.
>>     >     >     > PASSPHRASE variable not set, asking user.
>>     >     >     > Registering (mktemp) temporary file 
>> /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-0NoraC-2
>>     >     >     > Deleting /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-0NoraC-2
>>     >     >     > Forgetting temporary file 
>> /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-0NoraC-2
>>     >     >     > Processed volume 1 of 6249
>>     >     >     > Registering (mktemp) temporary file 
>> /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-86W2Nx-3
>>     >     >     > Error 'First patch in sequence [<duplicity.path.ROPath 
>> instance at 0x7ff444ab75f0>] was a diff' patching .
>>     >     >     > Deleting /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-86W2Nx-3
>>     >     >     > Forgetting temporary file 
>> /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mktemp-86W2Nx-3
>>     >     >     > Processed volume 2 of 6249
>>     >     >     > Releasing lockfile <lockfile.LinkFileLock instance at 
>> 0x7ff445991cf8>
>>     >     >     > Removing still remembered temporary file 
>> /tmp/duplicity-x9e2bC-tempdir/mkstemp-Q0Le0w-1
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > *********
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > Not sure what the 'First patch...' error means.
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > I'm positive the file name is spelled perfectly. I've 
>> copied it straight from the list-current-files.  Plus I've tried restoring 
>> the parent directory, and everything restores except the .odb files. So it 
>> definitely is not a mis-typing issue.
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > I'm running Kubuntu 14.04.5 LTS
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > Duplicity 0.6.23
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > If you still need the entire log output, let me know and I 
>> can put it up somewhere.
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > Thanks!
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > On 01/24/2017 11:09 AM, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
>>     >     >     >> There is nothing special about .odb files, so rerun the 
>> restore with -v9, save the entire log, and post it on pastebin or reply with 
>> attachment.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >> Are you quite certain that the filename is spelled and 
>> cased correctly.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >> Which duplicity version are you using?  What OS 
>> distro/version?
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >> ...Thanks,
>>     >     >     >> ...Ken
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Nertskull via 
>> Duplicity-talk <<mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> 
>> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> <mailto:address@hidden 
>> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden 
>> <mailto:address@hidden>>>>address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> 
>> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> <mailto:address@hidden 
>> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>> 
>> wrote:
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     I have a duplicity encrypted backup of a folder.  
>> That folder has many
>>     >     >     >>     subfolders and 4 files.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     1 file is an excel file.  The other 3 are LibreOffice 
>> Base database
>>     >     >     >>     (.odb) files.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     When I run
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>         duplicity list-current-files --encrypt-key XXX 
>> file:///path/to/backups
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     I get a list of the files.  ALL 4 are included in 
>> that list.  I see all
>>     >     >     >>     four files.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     When I run
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>         duplicity --encrypt-key XXX --file-to-restore
>>     >     >     >>     'relative/path/to/ExcelFile.xlsx' 
>> file:///path/to/backup /path/to/restore
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     I get the Excel file restored with NO problems.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     But if I run the SAME command, but just change from 
>> the excel file to
>>     >     >     >>     the base.odb file.  I get an error saying the
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>         "file.odb not found in archive, no files restored"
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     But of course it is there!  It is listed in the 
>> 'list-current-files'.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     And I know my syntax is right, because I can restore 
>> the excel file.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     Is there something weird about .odb files that causes 
>> duplicity to bug out?
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     ....
>>     >     >     >>     So I thought, alright lets restore the entire folder. 
>>  And sure enough,
>>     >     >     >>     no .odb files.  None of the 3 .odb files restore.  
>> Even though they are
>>     >     >     >>     listed as part of the backup using 
>> 'list-current-files'.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     Why do these files not restore?
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     _______________________________________________
>>     >     >     >>     Duplicity-talk mailing list
>>     >     >     >>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> 
>> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> <mailto:address@hidden 
>> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>> 
>> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden 
>> <mailto:address@hidden>> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> 
>> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>>
>>     >     >     >>     
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>>> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>>>>
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > _______________________________________________
>>     >     >     > Duplicity-talk mailing list
>>     >     >     > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> 
>> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> <mailto:address@hidden 
>> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>
>>     >     >     > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>>>
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >
>>     >     >     _______________________________________________
>>     >     >     Duplicity-talk mailing list
>>     >     >     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> 
>> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> <mailto:address@hidden 
>> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>
>>     >     >     https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk> 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk 
>> <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk>>>
>>     >     >
>>     >     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]