emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#17608: closed (24.3.91; foward-sexp via hideshow t


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#17608: closed (24.3.91; foward-sexp via hideshow triggers scan error -- no error manually)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 20:01:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2014 22:00:26 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#17608: 24.3.91; foward-sexp via hideshow triggers scan 
error -- no error manually
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #17608,
regarding 24.3.91; foward-sexp via hideshow triggers scan error -- no error 
manually
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
17608: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17608
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.3.91; foward-sexp via hideshow triggers scan error -- no error manually Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:12:56 +0200
Hello,

Running:
emacs -Q /usr/local/bin/latexmk -f cperl-mode --eval '(goto-char 301038)' -f 
forward-sexp
makes a scan error (unbalanced parenthese)

However, leaving out "-f forward-sexp" and hitting C-M-f manually once
emacs is loaded makes no error.

My guess is that there is some jit propertization/syntax-class-ization
that has to be done before C-M-f works. Evalling (message "%S"
(buffer-substring 301038 302108)) indeed shows that syntax-table
properties are used in the region. But what should be done to fix it ?

Fwiw, I encountered the problem trying to use hideshow :
emacs -Q /usr/local/bin/latexmk -f cperl-mode -f hs-minor-mode -f hs-hide-all

-- 
Nico.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#17608: 24.3.91; foward-sexp via hideshow triggers scan error -- no error manually Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 22:00:26 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.91 (gnu/linux)
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>> Maybe hs-hide-all should call (syntax-propertize (point-max)), then.
>> I forgot to follow up on this bug ; the following indeed worked for me :
>
> Thanks, please install into `trunk'.

In fact you had done that yourself two weeks ago. Closing the bug.

-- 
Nico.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]