emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#17759: closed (24.4.50; Missing 'ascii-character p


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#17759: closed (24.4.50; Missing 'ascii-character props)
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:52:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:50:35 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#17759: 24.4.50; Missing 'ascii-character props
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #17759,
regarding 24.4.50; Missing 'ascii-character props
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
17759: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17759
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.4.50; Missing 'ascii-character props Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 06:32:37 -0400
In the current development version this:

    (get 'kp-7 'ascii-character)

no longer works.  It seems to have been removed in what git shows as
revision 7f3c6d9a:

  Author: Juri Linkov <address@hidden>
  Date:   2013-12-13 03:03:04 +0200

  * lisp/simple.el <Keypad support>: Remove key bindings duplicated
    with bindings.el.

Perhaps the intention is to use only key definitions as the mappings,
but there is surely code that broke with the change.  (At least
"calculator.el" did, but I'll fix it if it was intentional.)

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#17759: 24.4.50; Missing 'ascii-character props Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:50:35 +0300 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>> +    (when (and (characterp normal) (eq (char-charset normal) 'ascii))
>
> Do you really need the (eq (char-charset normal) 'ascii) test?
>
> The `ascii-character' property doesn't have to be "ascii", really (the
> name is just a historical accident which dates back to many moons ago
> when ascii meant "plain text"), IIRC it just has to be a "real"
> character as opposed to something with modifiers like ?\M-\A-x.

Yes, the name is confusing, so I installed it without the ascii test.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]