emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#26074: closed ([PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add python-htmlmin


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#26074: closed ([PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add python-htmlmin)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 18:51:03 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:50:22 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#26074: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add python-htmlmin
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #26074,
regarding [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add python-htmlmin
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
26074: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26074
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add python-htmlmin Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:34:33 +0100
I have been thinking to package pgAdmin4

I gave up soon, too many deps

But these 3 are the ones I had already packaged

So I submit them anyway

There's no point in throwing them away

Attachment: 0001-gnu-Add-python-htmlmin.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#26074: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add python-htmlmin Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:50:22 +0100 User-agent: Notmuch/0.24 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Catonano <address@hidden> writes:

> 2017-03-13 17:22 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke <address@hidden>:
>
>> Catonano <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > 2017-03-12 19:40 GMT+01:00 Catonano <address@hidden>:
>> >
>> >> Marius,
>> >>
>> >> thank you for reviewing !
>> >>
>> >
>> > I'm almost ready.
>> >
>> > The only problem now is that python-flask-logins tests fail
>> >
>> > starting phase `check'
>> > running "python setup.py" with command "test" and parameters ()
>> > Checking pep8 compliance...
>> > flask_login/login_manager.py:409:29: E122 continuation line missing
>> > indentation or outdented
>> > make: *** [Makefile:23: pep8] Error 1
>> > phase `check' failed after 1.5 seconds
>> >
>> >
>> > I don't know what pep8 compliance is, it seems something similar to Guix
>> > linting for packages
>>
>> Yes, it's purely a style checker. Note that the "pep8" package has been
>> deprecated for "python-pycodestyle". Can you see if that works? If not,
>> we can probably skip those tests.
>>
>
> I tried with pycodestyle but it claims that the pep8 command can't be found.
> So I got it rolled back
>
>
>>
>> Thanks for working on it! Can you also add a copyright line with one of
>> the commits? Pseudonyms are fine :-)
>>
>
> Sorry, I forgot :-/
>
> I added a line for the copyright in a single commit so now they are 4
> patches

Thanks!

I changed the commit messages to match what we usually do for Python
packages. Also did minor edits to synopses and descriptions to please
`guix lint` and be slightly more user friendly (mostly copy-paste of
upstream descriptions), and changed the PEP8 comment to mention the bug
report you opened.

Also squashed the copyright commit into the first one. Pushed!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]