[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device)
From: |
Karl Eichwalder |
Subject: |
Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device) |
Date: |
23 Jul 2001 05:42:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.104 |
Thanks for all the other answers.
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> On 19 Jul 2001, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
>
> > Mule has issues (and you all know about them); maybe, the \201 issue is
> > fixed by -- unfortunately, I've still to handle broken files coming in
> > (on account of the Translation Project). It was (and is?) Emacs
> > creating those files. And Emacs 21.x is still clueless to detect this
> > mess and to guide the user to fix this files.
>
> IIRC, this is the first time someone suggests a feature that would try to
> fix those messed up files. I think it's a good idea, if those files can
> be repaired in many cases.
>
> What happens if you visit those files with "C-x RET c emacs-mule RET"
> before "C-x C-f"?
In the meantime François sent such a file to you (and larsi). I hope
you've had the time to run the tests; if not I can do it.
> > The consequence is, Gnus often thinks it has to create a
> > multipart message... Yes, it will only do so if you'll enter three 'y'
> > (yes) in a row -- this isn't "user-friendly" (Eli).
>
> I don't understand that last remark: I don't have anything to do with how
> Gnus handles this.
Sorry, this was a stupid remark by my side. I just wanted to draw
attention to the fact that features one calls user-friendly (toolbar,
customize, etc.) are unpleasant to a broad user base. I don't want to
discuss these decisions here: who codes has the right (or "power") to
decide what gets implemented and what not.
> > But it's Eli who permanently complains "we don't have enough developers".
> That's what I think. I'm entitled to tell that whenever I think it's
> appropriate: a development team that is not large enough cannot be
> expected to make radical changes too frequently, especially when the
> subject matter is outside of the immediate area of expertise of many
> of us.
That's exactly it the point. If nobody is able it maintain certain
parts of the code it has to go away (ange-ftp/VMS).
--
address@hidden (work) / address@hidden (home): |
http://www.suse.de/~ke/ | ,__o
Free Translation Project: | _-\_<,
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/contrib/po/HTML/ | (*)/'(*)
- Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Karl Eichwalder, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Miles Bader, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device),
Karl Eichwalder <=
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Stefan Monnier, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Richard Stallman, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode/Mule (Re: null-device), Dave Love, 2001/07/22