Re: MAINTAINERS file and .el files?

[Eli Zaretskii]

On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Pavel =?iso-8859-2?q?Jan=EDk?= wrote:

> do we need .el files listed in MAINTAINERS? We do have this information in
> .el files in Author: or Maintainer:, so I think it is useless/duplicated or
> Lisp part of this file should be autogenerated.

AFAIU, Stefan wanted only those files to be listed whose Maintainer 
headers says "FSF".  In that case, it's not redundant: no one says that 
the original author must be a maintainer.

> Maybe we should invent similar conventions we use for .el files for .c
> files and autogenerate this file completely. What do you think?

I think it would be a waste of effort.  What's wrong with having that
info in a single file?