[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apropos commands and regexps
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Apropos commands and regexps |
Date: |
Sat, 18 May 2002 23:30:14 -0600 (MDT) |
> But the search
> for these words should allow them to be substrings of words. It should
> not require an exact match against an entire word in the command name.
Substring search might yield too many hits, I'm afraid.
No more than Apropos gets now. Anyway, it is very useful. Let's try
it this way (i.e., no change in this regard) first; we could change
it later if necessary.
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, (continued)
Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kai Großjohann, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, D. Goel, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Alex Schroeder, 2002/05/16
- Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/17
Re: Apropos commands and regexps, Kim F. Storm, 2002/05/23