Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.

emacs-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.

From:	Rob Browning
Subject:	Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
Date:	Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:53:37 -0500
User-agent:	Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu)

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> There is no need for them to be different, so we may as well make them
> the same.  Can you figure out the cause of the remaining differences?

Certainly -- it's on my to do list.  I'll work on it as I have time.

Thanks

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., (continued)
- Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question., Richard Stallman, 2002/06/01

Prev by Date: address@hidden: bad translations in quail latin-3-prefix]
Next by Date: [PATCH] allow function values for `enable-local-eval'
Previous by thread: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
Next by thread: Re: Building emacs with and without X -- packaging question.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread