[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:52:10 -0600 (MDT) |
The macro BINDING_STACK_SIZE was introduced for
specpdl_ptr - specpdl, but its name is misleading.
The value is not the *size* of the stack, but rather
the position of the stack pointer within the stack.
A better name would be SPECPDL_INDEX.
Would someone please make that global replacement?
- BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/10
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Andreas Schwab, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/11