[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ?\_ patch
|
From: |
Damien Elmes |
|
Subject: |
Re: ?\_ patch |
|
Date: |
Sat, 08 Feb 2003 02:13:49 +1100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> The Lisp manual doesn't refer to C syntax to explain e.g. ?\t.
> So to me, \s and \t are equally self-explanatory.
I agree. I also think that the more verbose you make the "proper" way to go
about it, the more likely people are going to be lazy and just use "? ". Why
introduce a whole new #\ syntax when ?foo is currently widely used to
represent characters?
Regards,
--
Damien Elmes
- Re: ?\_ patch, (continued)
- Re: ?\_ patch, Dmitry Paduchikh, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, John Paul Wallington, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, John Paul Wallington, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/08
- Re: ?\_ patch, Miles Bader, 2003/02/09
- Re: ?\_ patch, Dmitry Paduchikh, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch,
Damien Elmes <=
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/09
- Re: ?\_ patch, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/10
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/10
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/10
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/11
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/12