[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ?\_ patch
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: ?\_ patch |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:08:10 -0500 |
Ok. So I assume that you want ?XY to be invalid syntax
unless Y is <= 040 or one of " ' ; ( ) [ ] ? or #
That is the idea. I can see how someone could have written (?a(b))
and think it legitimate, but a person could hardly argue that (?ab)
instead of (?a b) is legitimate.
It's possible there is some other syntax char I have forgotten
that should be legitimate there too. If you can think of one,
please add it.
- Re: ?\_ patch, (continued)
- Re: ?\_ patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/09
- Re: ?\_ patch, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/10
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/07
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/10
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/10
- Re: ?\_ patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/02/11
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/12
- Re: ?\_ patch,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kim F. Storm, 2003/02/13
- Re: ?\_ patch, Kenichi Handa, 2003/02/05
- Re: ?\_ patch, Andreas Schwab, 2003/02/06