Re: request for a new function, say, `sequence'

[Miles Bader]

Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> > recall that the function signature is usually
> >   (iota COUNT &optional START INTERVAL)
> 
> Ah, it's more general, but not convenient for the current
> situation where we want to specify START and END
> explicitely.  Otherwise, the code gets difficult to read.

I think this is a rather minor issue.  After all, the whole point of
this dicussion is whether it's a good idea to add a general function
rather than keeping the current specific one; if you want maximum
convenience, obviously the latter is the right way to go.

-Miles
-- 
自らを空にして、心を開く時、道は開かれる