[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diff-apply-hunk broken
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: diff-apply-hunk broken |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Apr 2004 22:47:11 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (usg-unix-v) |
At 02 Apr 2004 20:48:04 -0500, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Is --label accepted by all known non-ancient diff implementations?
>> Yes. --label has been supported ever since diffutils 2.0, released in
>> 1992. These days it's safe to assume --label, if it's GNU diff.
>
> I can't assume GNU diff. So how about other system's `diff'?
Some "diff" implementations lack -L, so portable applications cannot
use "diff -L". For example, Solaris 9 "diff" lacks -L. -L is not
standardized by POSIX.
I recall that this is not a problem with GNU Emacs, as it tests
whether diff supports -L (or --label) before using that option.
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/04/01
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Miles Bader, 2004/04/01
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/01
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/08