[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).
From: |
Lőrentey Károly |
Subject: |
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:48:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> In article <address@hidden>, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>>> I did a test merge of multi-tty with tiling, and there are actually very
>>> few
>>> patch conflicts, though the RIF changes probably do mean there are few
>>> semantic errors in the result.
>>>
>>> I'd love see the multi-tty changes go in -- not just because it's a great
>>> feature (and it is), but because I like the code cleanup. Compared to the
>>> current "everything global all the time" code, it should make things a bit
>>> easier to understand, which is no small thing given the confusingness of
>>> the
>>> redisplay code.
>
>> Yes, I also look forward to the RIF cleanup from the multi-tty patch.
>> I had plans to do this cleanup myself sometime, but Romain beat me to it.
>
>> It should definitely go in soon after 21.5 is branched from trunk.
>
> I don't object to it, but if it changes some internal
> interfaces, I'd like to ask to merge it after emacs-unicode
> merge is done. At least emacs-unicode doesn't change RIF.
That's OK with me; my branch follows HEAD, and I will happily merge in
the unicode changes as soon as they appear there. (I looked at the
unicode branch a few months ago and it seemed the merge could be done
without too much work.)
--
Károly
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., (continued)
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/09
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/10
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Romain Francoise, 2004/04/10
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/10
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/10
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/04/11
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).,
Lőrentey Károly <=
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/04/10
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/11
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/11
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/04/12
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/12
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/04/13
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Juri Linkov, 2004/04/11
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/07
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kenichi Handa, 2004/04/07
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/04/07