[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Buffer-local faces
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Buffer-local faces |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2004 16:08:15 -0400 |
Then subtracting face attributes would be useful too.
I think this is much added complexity without much added benefit.
If there are specific attributes you'd like to override,
you can do that by merging a face which has different values
for those attributes. That does more or less the same job
without the added complexity.
- Re: Buffer-local faces, (continued)
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/04
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/04
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Miles Bader, 2004/05/06
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/05
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05
- Re: Buffer-local faces,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Buffer-local faces, David Kastrup, 2004/05/04
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/04
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/04
- Re: Buffer-local faces, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05