[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: describe-mode's treatment of minor-modes is annoying
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: describe-mode's treatment of minor-modes is annoying |
Date: |
Wed, 5 May 2004 13:32:41 -0700 |
Yes, I checked it in vanilla (GNU) Emacs 20.7 (emacs -q).
The major mode is described first.
For minor modes, see following pages.
So users knew the minor mode info was there, and they saw the major mode
info first.
> If you've checked this, you're surely correct. But I remember that the
> minor mode info was not very visible, and not easy to use. That was
> the reason for the change.
I too think the minor (and major!) mode info was not very visible - because
everything was visible together, separated only by ^L. And not very easy to
use, because users needed to know about C-].
Even a horizontal bar (a la <HR> in HTML) would be a better separator
visually than ^L.
- Drew
- Re: describe-mode's treatment of minor-modes is annoying, (continued)
- Re: describe-mode's treatment of minor-modes is annoying, Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: describe-mode's treatment of minor-modes is annoying, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05
- Re: describe-mode's treatment of minor-modes is annoying, Miles Bader, 2004/05/05
- Re: describe-mode's treatment of minor-modes is annoying, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/06
- Re: describe-mode's treatment of minor-modes is annoying, Miles Bader, 2004/05/06
- Re: describe-mode's treatment of minor-modes is annoying, Peter Whaite, 2004/05/06
- Re: describe-mode's treatment of minor-modes is annoying, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2004/05/07