[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails |
Date: |
Sat, 15 May 2004 22:32:44 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Let's instead use Handa's suggestion. I think it will
> avoid all the problems.
Handa's suggestion was about the default value. But such formatting
function is still needed. Merely for the purpose of not duplicating
the same formatting code in different places (C-x C-e, M-:, edebug).
The fact that it will allow easy customization is a good side-effect
of adding this function.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, (continued)
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/14
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/14
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, David Kastrup, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/18
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/19
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/11
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Kenichi Handa, 2004/05/12
Re: printing most-negative-fixnum fails, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10