Re: improving query-replace and query-replace-regexp

[Werner LEMBERG]

>     After a M-%, you should already be able to continue the same
>     query-replace action with: M-% RET
> 
> That sounds like an acceptable feature.  I don't think an empty
> argument to M-% makes any other sense.

I just wonder why I still have to type `RET'.  A query-replace action
doesn't happen immediately; you still have to press `y', `n', etc.
Thus I suggest, if possible, to omit the `RET'.


    Werner