[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired"
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired" |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:35:45 -0500 (CDT) |
I believe I misunderstood some remarks in `(elisp)Standard File Names'.
I thought I understood from it that MS-DOS uses `_' for extensions, but
after careful reading, it appears to use `_' for "invisible" files.
So maybe we should allow [ \t._] before the [?*] (to allow making
files invisible) and [ \t.] after the file. Unless we want to go for
a more general solution.
Sincerely,
Luc.
Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Eli Zaretskii, 2004/08/21
Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Richard Stallman, 2004/08/21