[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proof-reading manuals
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Proof-reading manuals |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:29:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> The original aim was to have everything proofread by at
> least two persons. For the Elisp manual, that seems unrealistic now.
>
> Everything should be proofread by at least two. This is perfectly
> easy if people participate, so please do not suggest to people
> that the goal has changed.
I have added a second "DONE2" column to the lists in FOR-RELEASE -- so we can
keep track of which sections have been reviewed (at least) twice.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, (continued)
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/10
- Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/14
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Richard Stallman, 2004/09/16
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/18
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Richard Stallman, 2004/09/19
- Re: Proof-reading manuals,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Stefan, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/13
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2004/09/15
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/13
Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/10