Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.]

[Jérôme Marant]

Quoting Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:

> I think Emacs is such a large package that it doesn't make sense to
> have a new version more than once in a month or two.  But that, too,
> was never discussed nor codified since we never could end a pretest as
> soon as that.  Perhaps we should delay this discussion until we get to
> such a situation for the first time.

How about using odd minor version numbers for development versions
and even minor version number for stable releases?

Hence, 21.4.z would be a stable release and we would freely use z.
21.5.z would be the next development release renamed 22.0 later?

--
Jérôme Marant