[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New undo element (fun . args)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: New undo element (fun . args) |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 06:46:33 -0500 |
It turned out to be quite tricky to get the usage right as an apply
function need to install a proper _redo_ entry which may not really do
anything but re-install the original _undo_ entry etc.
Ifr the extensible undo entry does some other nontrivial job,
surely its redo entry should redo that nontrivial job, right?
So how can it be that the redo entry only reinstalls the undo entry?
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), (continued)
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Richard Stallman, 2005/02/03
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Kim F. Storm, 2005/02/04
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Richard Stallman, 2005/02/05
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Kim F. Storm, 2005/02/07
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Richard Stallman, 2005/02/07
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Kim F. Storm, 2005/02/09
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Kim F. Storm, 2005/02/07
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), David Kastrup, 2005/02/07
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/07
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Richard Stallman, 2005/02/08
- Re: New undo element (fun . args),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Kim F. Storm, 2005/02/08
- Re: New undo element (fun . args), Richard Stallman, 2005/02/03