[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
address@hidden: Re: loaddefs.el has no effect]
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
address@hidden: Re: loaddefs.el has no effect] |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:46:51 -0400 |
I don't know when Eli will have time to fix this, but I think this is
an important problem and we should fix it soon. Can someone fix it now,
and ack to me?
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:51:07 +0200
From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
To: "RGB" <address@hidden>
In-reply-to: <address@hidden> (address@hidden)
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: loaddefs.el has no effect
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
Sender: address@hidden
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on monty-python
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
> From: "RGB" <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:56:07 -0500
>
> call "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\VC98\Bin\VCVARS32.BAT"
> call configure
> nmake bootstrap
>
> I run emacs like this:
>
> set path=%path%;C:\Program Files\aspell\bin
> set home=C:\emacs\custom
> c:\emacs\bin\runemacs.exe %1 %2 %3
>
> If I do a bootstrap build but don't do an install I will still get a
> c:\emacs\bin\emacs.exe. I'm thinking this is what you are calling
> bootstrap-emacs. Whatever it's called it works fine and is mostly
> indistinguishable from the version that is later built using loaddefs.el.
> That version remains in emacs/src/obj-spd/i386/emacs.exe until I run
> install.
Okay, thanks for the explanations. I see the reason now:
bootstrap-emacs is copied to bin/emacs.exe and remains there even
after the final binary is produced. I will fix that when I have time.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
------- End of forwarded message -------
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- address@hidden: Re: loaddefs.el has no effect],
Richard M. Stallman <=