[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes]
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes] |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:10:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
> This patch removes the bug. But I am not very familiar with the
> window code, so if someone could check that this is correct, it'd be
> great.
Thanks for fixing this. A minor issue: When I now split a window with
(progn
(split-window-horizontally)
(let ((window-min-width 1))
(shrink-window (1- (window-width)) t)))
I get two windows where the left one has width 1 - I'm not sure whether
windows with width 1 are valid as such. Evaluating
(with-selected-window (split-window-horizontally)
(let ((window-min-width 1))
(shrink-window (1- (window-width)) t)))
the new window is deleted immediately. Hence the behavior has become
asymmetric. Since you didn't change line 4091 of window.c the way you
changed line 4067 that case is apparently handled in a different manner.
- address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes], Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/12
- Re: address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes], Chong Yidong, 2006/02/17
- Re: address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes], Chong Yidong, 2006/02/18
- Re: address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes], martin rudalics, 2006/02/18
- Re: address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes], Chong Yidong, 2006/02/18
- Re: address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes], martin rudalics, 2006/02/19
- Re: address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes], martin rudalics, 2006/02/20
- Re: address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes], Richard Stallman, 2006/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: check_min_window_sizes], Kim F. Storm, 2006/02/19